Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

GNS480

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
103 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

 

GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:11 pm

Good Day

 

Looking to upgrade my panel does anyone have a GNS480 installed any good/bad comments would be appreciated.

Thanks

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Kristin Winter » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:10 pm

I have a 480. I love the unit. There is a Yahoo email list thingee for the 480 that has a lot of knowledgeable folks.

 

The best thumbnail description of the 480 in comparison to the 430/530 units is that the 480 is for IFR pilots who occasionally fly VFR and the 430/530 units are for VFR pilots who occasional fly IFR. The two units think a bit differently and the 480 has airways in the database, and the 430/530 does not. To program the 480 for a trip, you have to tell it the destination first, and then fill in how you want to get there. The 430/530 you enter sequential points, one after the other. That is a lot of work on a long flight unless you are going direct or nearly so.

Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:24 pm

Robert... this is kind of like arguing religion... There is a users group over on Yahoo that you should join and then you can view the several thousands of comments that are posted there.

 

IMHO It really comes down to your attitude and approach to flying. If you want to hit D> you don't want to go with the 480... you will not be happy with it. If you are a bit more of a geek (I'll throw myself on that pile as I have one)... and want an experience that is more like a FMS... the 480 does that. JVB pulled his dual 480s and installed a 750 and a 650 to replace. That is probably "the high end solution". I really like the 480 as it flys the airways... no intermediate way points have to be entered.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gns480-users/

It took me a few hours to get up to speed on the 480... I had to think... (YUCK!). But I love it.

Jim

Kristin beat me with her reply and it asked me to review my comments... still submitting as written

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby James Turner » Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:38 pm

Hi Bill,

 

I installed my 480 a year ago and absolutely love it. My only regret is not installing two of them. My background is military and airline; the 480 works very much like an airliners FMS so it was a very easy transition.

There is a great free simulator available for the PC where you are able to use your current Jepp database to practice whatever where ever. I have found it very useful to be able to see how the arrivals and departures load up and sequence from the comfort of my office desk before going out and flying it for real.

Bang for the buck; I don't think the 480 can be beaten.

James.

User avatar
James Turner
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:20 am

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:55 pm

In the interest of full disclosure. I have a GNS 480 (CNX ) with a MX200... flying is one step short of having synthetic vision...

 

Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby JIMICS2452 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:40 pm

I have added a 480 and an MX 20 to the panel of my plane this winter, and I could not be happier. I flew a corporate Seneca with that set up for over 400 hours and found the system to easy to use one I understood the logic behind it. Reroutes are easily accomplished with the 480, especially when the involve airways, as they usually do.

 

With a little selective shopping the cost for both was less than a 430W.

I also second all of the above comments.

Jim Hiatt

Jim Hiatt
User avatar
JIMICS2452
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 9:26 pm
Location: Pine Shadows Airpark - North Fort Myers, FL

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:14 pm

Thanks for all the comments I watched video on line the other day from a fellow by the name of David McVinnie that gave what I thought a decent introduction to the unit and its capabilities. It impressed me in regards what it can do.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhIwBUKL_-E

Regards

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Charles Schefer » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:27 pm

+1 for the 480. I bought a PA-30 with a 480. I also fly a Cirrus equipped with Dual 430s and a Cessna 340A with a 530W. I would say for someone new to either unit the 430/530 may be quicker to learn and the operation is fairly simple. The 480 is a bit more sophisticated but I LOVE IT. It's like a full FMS with all the airways. There are LOTS and LOTS of cool details to it and it is very well thought out. One example (and I could give dozens) - When updating the database the card it uses is a simple Compact Flash card not a proprietary Garmin card. The CF card holds 2 databases at once so you can update the card to the soon to be current database version. The unit will keep using the "current" database until the new one becomes current based on date and it will then automatically switch. Very cool. With the 430 / 530 I always debate if it's "legal" to update before a new database is current. Anyway there are lots of things like that with the 480 that are cool.

 

I'd suggests downloading the manuals and PC simulator for it from the Garmin website to get a better hands-on idea. The "knob-ology" is very different from the 430/530 though so don't get frustrated and give it some time if the 430 is what you are used to.

One final comment.... recently I heard someone talk about waning support for the 480. I asked Garmin about this and they said they have government contracts that require continued 480 support for at least another 8 years. Just FYI.

Good luck,

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:37 am

Charles

 

Thanks for the all the positive comments I have purchased a unit and currently it is going into Garmin for a Software update and a bench test to 8130 standards. I go down to Houston on business in a couple of weeks and hope to bring it home with me. I will certainly down load the manuals and simulator and start working with the unit.

Regards

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:47 am

Bill... a bit of a puzzle as you post as Robert Miller.. but hey... I've been called a lot of names in my life...so what ever.

 

A very knowledgeable source on these boxes told me that when Garmin announced that they would not be making any more that the gov't... ordered 200 more ... so a bit of a support statement.

It will tryst your mind..

but all the best in getting up to speed.... when you are in the "shit"... this is the box to have as your co-pilot.

All the best!
Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:44 am

Good Day,

 

Been working with the simulator manuals etc and looking for more advice.

The 430W /530W provide a glidepath style indication on RNAV a (GNSS) approaches called LNAV+V, the +V gives you a 3 deg Glidepath angle not necessarily guaranteed of obstacle clearance.

Will the 480 provide lat and vertical similar to the 430/530 on RNAV (GNSS) Approaches and does it provide obstacle information?

I cannot seem to find this info out in the material I'm looking at.

Also what nav head would you suggest to install for loc/gl support?

Thanks

Bill

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby md11flyer » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:49 am

The vnav portion of the 430/530 does provide obstacle clearance, as long as you follow the rnav approach plate limits.

 

Gary

md11flyer
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:48 pm

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Ron B Keil » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:44 am

I have been reading all of the posts praising the 480 and putting down the 430W and 530W. When investing in new avionics, one question I always have is what is the Manufacture's future direction, and how does my new installation fit into that future.

 

Clearly, Garmin is trying to move everyone to their new touch screen GTN series. They are building some bridges to the old GNS430W and GNS530W, such as crossfill.
The GDL88, which is Garmin's nicely thought out ADS B in and out solution will interface to the GTN series, the 430W and 530W, but not the 480, and there don't appear to be any plans to provide connection to the 480.

A lot of the products from the Garmin AT division, such as the SL30 and SL40, MX200, etc have very nice features, but Garmin has been slowly moving away from them.

Just some additional food for thought.

Ron Keil

Ron B Keil
ICS Secretary
ICS Secretary
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 am

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:49 pm

Ron, I can't speak for others but the intent of my post was not to bash or knock the 430/530 line. I've flown 100s of hours with them and love them and frankly find them simpler to use. That said I very much like my 480. You are right that Garmin has not invested a great deal (and won't at this point) in making the 480 more compatible with the rest of the Garmin product line. Some things will interface (e.g. GTX 327 transponder) but other things won't (wish the flight plan on my 480 could be automatically fed into my aera510).

 

The 480 is (IMHO) a great product. Yesterday I flew from DC to Boston and back and my routing was changed no less than 6 times (complete new full route via airways). Having the airways in the 480 like a "mini-FMS" was awesome. Didn't have knob it all in. Also I can tell you that the folks at Garmin told me the 480 platform was what they used as the base for the new GTN series. Others may say otherwise and in truth I don't know for sure but that is what the techs I spoke to at Garmin told me during one call.

I think the 430 / 530 and 480 are all great tools...

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:01 am

@ Ron... over on Yahoo's 480 user's group... there was talk a few weeks back about one more upgrade for the 480... I was under the impression it related to ADSB... I don't recall the timing and I can't locate the exact post right now... but I'm pretty sure (short of finding the specific post) that there was an interface coming. The post contained a statement about the gov't has so many of these units that they were insisting that the capability be added.

 

Kristin... do you recall the posting?... you lurk there more than I do.

All the best!
Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: GNS480

Postby Kristin Winter » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:45 am

Jim,

I understand from reading those posts that there would be an update, but what the scope of that update is, I didn't really understand. Much of their discussion is over my head.

Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:47 am

Good Day

I got the GNS-480 installed and very impressed with it.

I have a question in regards to fuel flow data, we were able to allow the 480 to talk to the JPI 700 and provided the necessary data to give me fuel required, remaining etc on the JPI but I do not get any data on the 480.

Does any one know if I can feed data from the same flow meter into the 480 as we do the JPI?

Thanks

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

Re: GNS480

Postby JIMICS2452 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:59 pm

Probably not. My Insight G4 gets time to destination from which it calculates fuel remaining data, but fuel flow data is not supplied to the 480.
Jim Hiatt
User avatar
JIMICS2452
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 9:26 pm
Location: Pine Shadows Airpark - North Fort Myers, FL

Re: GNS480

Postby skipsouthernsky » Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:01 pm

Dear Bill,

The JPI and the 480 will talk to each other just fine. At least mine do. You probably don't have all the wires hooked up properly. I think there is an Rx, Tx, and ground wire that all have to be hooked up on that particular port. You will have to check out both of the installation manuals to get the specifics. There are also some set up adjustments (configuration) in the JPI that have to be set properly. On my 2nd map page on the 480 (there are four pages) I have all the fuel information displayed. It only takes one click of the round knob to get there on my 480. Each of the pages has user selectable data that can be displayed.

As we have all discussed previously on this thread, the 480 is a very capable unit, but the learning curve for the pilot is steep. It's also possible that the fuel flow information is already being sent to the 480 and you just aren't pushing the right buttons to bring it up. I can't tell from here which is the culprit. My recommendation would be to first find an instructor who can lead you through some of the 480 basics and at the same time use his wisdom in your particular plane to see if fuel flow really isn't being received by the 480. If that is the case, then the second step would be to a go to the person or shop that did the install and have them double check that wiring or the configuration until they can show you that the info is on the 480 as well as on the JPI.

I highly recommend that you seek out a 480 instructor that is very familiar and can check that for you. My strong hunch is that is where you will find the problem, but can't be certain from this distance. Reading the owners manual in depth would be helpful for you also.

Sincerely,
Skip Dykema

Skip Dykema, ICS #3062
Comanche 180, Commercial-Instrument, SEL, MEL, A&P
skipsouthernsky
Past President
Past President
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 7:40 pm
Location: Davie, Florida (Ft. Lauderdale)

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:19 pm

@Bill (Robert Miller) ... the transducers in my twinco talk to the Shadin, the JPI and fuel information is also displayed on the 480. I think that it is a JPI /480 interface... that makes the 480 fuel smart.

All the best!
Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:02 am

Thanks everyone for the all the information on the 480, with our long winter up here in the great white north (still 2 feet of snow at my airport north of Calgary) I was finally able to go out and work on my fuel display issue in the 480. Found out the JPI was putting out data to the 480 Ok and in the configuration set-up in the 480 you have an option to select fuel data input or FADEC input and my avionics fellow had set fuel and we needed to set FADEC. Simple change but took a while to trouble shoot as you cannot run configuration on the 480 when the aircraft is operating.

Skip is correct it is a steep learning curve to learn how to operate the 480 but it is sure worth it so far.

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta

Re: GNS480

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:16 am

Bill,

If you go to the Garmin website and search for the 480 you will find there is a PC based simulator for it. I've used all the Garmin simulators for different aircraft I fly and while the 480 sim is not as well developed as say the 430/530 sim in that it does not have the HSI and altitude selector it is a very good sim and runs the actual 480 code. it's a great way to learn in the comfort of an armchair vs in the air.

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: GNS480

Postby MULEFLY » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:29 am

If you go to the group on Yahoo... and read a bit of history... there is a library link for the very latest simulator... I seem to recall that it is more recent than the one on Garmin (but I may be wrong). It was sent to a fellow that has written a couple of "How To" books about the 480 and while he held it for a bit... he eventually put it in the library because at that time Garmin had not.

Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: GNS480

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:30 am

Very good to know - thanks Jim!

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: GNS480

Postby Robert Miller » Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:38 am

Thanks Jim and Charles for the information on the 480 simulators I will take a look on the sites and see what I can find.

Best Regards

Bill
Robert Miller
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am
Location: Alberta
This topic was modified 5 years ago by ICS archives 2008-2018

   
Quote
Share: