Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

engine monitor

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
114 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

engine monitor

Postby Ruy Lloyd » Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:38 am

Hello, anybody installed a MVP 50 in your panel? I am ready to by but I need same advise for example which fuel probe is the best for fuel level etc. Thanks!
User avatar
Ruy Lloyd
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 2:16 am
Location: carmen de areco
  •  

Re: engine monitor

Postby Kent Gillen » Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:41 pm

Ruy,

I am also ready to get an engine monitor and wondering if anyone has a preference or recommendation. I would like to tie into my 430 for another fuel gauge backup and planning. Anxious to see your replies.

Kent

Kent Gillen
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:55 am

Re: engine monitor

Postby James Turner » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:55 pm

Hi,

As a point of comparison I installed a JPI 930 in my -180 recently.

I like the way it functions but it was not without its teething problems. The problems were not the fault of the unit per Se but the installation is very critical. The build quality of the unit seems a bit light weight to me and only time will tell whether it stands up to the rigours of usage. Lastly, the four mounting screws are TINY and only engage with 3 or 4 threads max. The kicker is that if you over tighten (even slightly) and bottom out the screw it will crack the screen. I made up an additional support bracket. It hasn't fallen out... yet.

All in all I am pleased that I installed the JPI. Now that it is working properly it does everything I want it to do and tidied up the panel a lot.

The JPI uses the existing aircraft resistive fuel level sensors but with new wiring. They say to get the sensors reconditioned before install and that is probably good advice. At the end of the day it is still a GA quality system not an airline/military quality system...

Cheers,

James.

P.S. It is connected to my CNX 80 as well.

User avatar
James Turner
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:20 am

Re: engine monitor

Postby MULEFLY » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:05 pm

I installed JPIs in each of my last 2 aircraft... both the single and the twin. In my opinion they are a "very high want". Yes, you have to be careful on the length of screw... my avionics shop cracked one by using screws that were too long. However, having resolved that they have been very reliable devices.

All the best!
Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: engine monitor

Postby N3322G » Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:47 pm

I've been happy with JPI 7604C in the twin since 2005 - moved it in 2007 when we re-did the panel and moved it just to the left of the center radio stack to make it more readily in the pilot scan. Added the oil temp feature and had some early problems due to install of probes. Reminds me, the shop took out the factory CHT probes which is no-no unless the unit is STC'd to act as primary gauge.

We use Shadin for fuel qty and flow - it is STC'd to act as primary by Osborne. It ties to the GPS - very nice set-up so engine monitor is not required for this function.

Pat

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

Re: engine monitor

Postby Ruy Lloyd » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:49 pm

HI everybody I just bought the MVP 50. Am wating for it because I live in Argentina. When I installed it I will give my opinion!!!!
Ruy
User avatar
Ruy Lloyd
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 2:16 am
Location: carmen de areco
  •  

   
Quote
Share: