Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

Engine Instruments Delima

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
162 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

 

Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:46 pm

 
Attachments
Test Leads.jpg
Oil Temp Test Wiring
Eng Inst 8000MSL Cruise Std-Atm.jpg
Engine Gauges
User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Mark Anderson » Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:53 pm

A JPI 960 would be nice. Very accurate fuel gauges.
User avatar
Mark Anderson
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Huntsville , AL

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby N3322G » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:09 am

Charles,

 

In 2005 when we did the engine O/Hs, we put in a 760 to protect and diagnose problems with the engines - it has paid for itself more than once. We also put in the optional oil temp feature - of course, leaving the original gauges as they were. So I'm comfortable we have accurate oil temp readings through the JPI - took two iterations of install of the probes.

The original gauges read a touch higher in cruise than yours but not much. Interestingly, the left also reads a needles-width lower than the right - has as long as I can recall.

Not sure this is the answer you want to hear.

We have found a fine line between wanting everything perfect and everything safe. I used to overhaul most stuff - now I have a tendency to buy new if available as a couple of O/H's have only lasted a couple of years and then we have to either do it again or buy new. I dislike downtime for maintenance although I really enjoy the personal relationships with the maintenance personnel and their families. So my approach may be different than what works for others. At 63, I may only have another few years to readily fly. Perhaps more but I feel my flight clock ticking :-)

This leads me to praise Al Powers as my idol - he O/H'd both of his engines at age 83 IIRC and still flies often from a 2300' strip.

Pat

 

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:34 am

Mark / Pat - Thanks for the replies.

 

Mark - yes I agree a 960 would be very sweet indeed but I'm not ready to take that leap. I think my wife would shoot me if I spent $20K+ after install on a 960. That said I do want some sort of engine analyzer and to Pat's point - I can well imagine it will pay for itself during it's life.

Pat - thanks. I don't yet have your ownership experience so I probably haven't yet wised up :) The folks at Air Parts claim they can make them accurate to within 2%. I'd be happy to have my gauges within a dot width and I have heard (or rather read) Zach's comments about using them as a "relative reference". At any rate, like you I don't want down time and after a lot of research yesterday I came to the conclusion yesterday that - yes I could get Aerospace Logic or EI replacements for individual gauges and even though the direct gauge cost was not all that much more the installation, wiring, panel surgery etc... would end up costing more. In addition to the thoughts above I know myself well enough to know that I would not be content with some old gauges and some new. I quickly realized that what I really want is going to cost $6K or more when all said and done and if I am going to do that I'd rather have an integrated monitor where the data can be downloaded (as cool as the Aerospace Logic gauges are individually).

So... this morning I shipped my Oil Temp and Pressure gauges to Air Parts and they should have them tomorrow. Hopefully I'll get them back next week (or soon and get them reinstalled. I actually like those old AC gauges. I am going to try to get them as accurate as possible (again Air Parts says "within 2%") I guess I will see.... The bottom line is I don't currently have a JPI (or similar) and I cant' justify flying around with a gauge reading 60F for oil temp the whole time. So I haven't wised up in the sense that I am in pursuit of "new" old gauges. As soon as I can I plan to add something like a JPI and while the 960 is awesome, I would be quite happy with a 760. I suspect that JPI will soon have something new in the twin -secondary market to replace the 760. Insight has their new G4 Twin coming out and it looks awesome. There is currently a big gap in JPI's line between the 760 and the 960. They need something that is similar to an 830 on the single engine side but for a twin, but not so far as the 960 that costs 20K and is primary... something that will still fit in an 3.125" hole. I will wait a bit and see. An Aspen Pro PFD is also on my list of wants.

By the way Pat - I very much enjoyed the Comanche Care article in the latest Flyer.

- Charles

PS - If anyone has a set of factory CHT gauges they are looking to get rid of please let me know, I'm interested.

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:46 pm

My overhauled and calibrated oil temps, oil pressures, and fuel flow gauge all come back from Air Parts tomorrow. Once they are reinstalled and tested I will post the results.

 

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:32 pm

The new oil pressure and temp gauges went in and now appear to be much more accurate! However, they also appear to show what we can also see with an externally connected and calibrated oil pressure gauge. The oil pressure on both engines is running high. The proper range is 25psi minimum at idle, range for normal operations is 60-90psi and up to 100psi is allowed for start-up. In actuality my oil pressures are running more like 105 - 107psi at start and then after warm up at 2000 - 2500 static RPM oil pressure is more like 95psi.

 

I spoke to Lycoming and they said that years ago the type cert on MOST IO-320s was modified to make the start up pressure up to 115psi and normal ops up to 95psi. However the IO-320-B1A remains at 60-90psi and 100psi max at start up. They said they think it was just an oversight that the B1A was not similarly modified in the type cert but nevertheless 60-90 is the correct range. So my IA and I are following the book procedure to adjust pressures down to the proper range.

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Wed May 15, 2013 3:00 pm

To bring this thread to a close, here is a new pic of my engine instruments after:

 

- Oil Temperature gauges overhauled and calibrated to new Rochester oil blubs under STC from Air Parts of Lockhaven
- Oil Pressure gauges overhauled and calibrated by Air Parts of Lockhaven

Using an freshly-calibrated external mechanics pressure gauge (0-200psi scale) we measured actual oil pressures on each engine and in discussion with Lycoming adjusted the regulators on each engine so everything is in spec. We now see 80psi oil pressure in cruise and all other book settings in range.

So here's a pic of the gauges in cruise now. Oil pressure is perfect. Oil temps are close to perfect as well though it appears left oil temp just runs a little hotter than the right, I'm not sure why. All the baffling is like new and seems tight. The CHT gauges both read around 300F. This was at 8,500MSL on a close to standard day. 22"MP and 2400RPM. OAT was about -3C.

Engine Temps & Press.png
Gauges after calibration and engine oil pressure regulator adjustment

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby N3322G » Wed May 15, 2013 4:41 pm

Nice - can't get much more centered in the green - happy engines, happy gauges, happy pilot.
Pat

 

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby MULEFLY » Wed May 15, 2013 5:11 pm

Charles... I have a JPI installed so my data is digital... regarding higher oil temps. My baffles are pretty tight... but the left oil temp was always 10 to 20F hotter than the right one. I read a lot and decided to replace it... they can get clogged over time and lose some of their capacity to cool the oil. New oil cooler installed and they are now within a couple of degrees.

 

All the best!
Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu May 16, 2013 3:41 am

Thanks Pat - yes I am much happier.

 

Thanks Jim - interesting point. My engines and all accessories were overhauled 500hrs ago by a reputable facility. That said I am not sure the oil coolers were part of that I'll research. If you can point me in the direction of any specific reading you recommend (or I can just search the forums and google) I'd appreciate it. I'm envious of your JPI. I plan to put one in as soon as possible. I'm actually eying the Insight G4 Twin that is soon to be released... but for now the stock gauges have to do and I just wanted them accurate.

When you replaced - did you replace both oil coolers to "re-baseline" them or just the one that was high? I'd sure like mine to be identical...

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby N3322G » Thu May 16, 2013 4:44 am

Charles,

 

Oil coolers are considered engine accessories and may not have been changed when the engine was O/H. Charlie Melot of Zephyr Engines recommended that we replace them at O/H as the cost for O/H didn't make much sense when for just a bit more, you could have new. Our JPI oil temps are within a couple of degrees of one another with the new oil coolers.

Pat

 

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu May 16, 2013 1:44 pm

Pat - thanks. Based on what you and Jim both posted it sounds like replacing oil cooler may be in my near future. Any idea (roughly) what it costs to buy a new oil cooler? Does not look like it would be too much labor to change since it's just sitting on the top of the engine. Of course I am relying on the factory gauges but Air Parts says they should be accurate to within 2% which is factory spec and they calibrated them side by side because that's how the would be installed. New oil bulbs and new O/Hed gauges plus we ohmed out the wires from the bulb to the gauge to make sure the wires were all good and they were. So... the gauges should be reasonably accurate.

 

Also - I assume these engines have a vernatherm just like any other recip? Maybe the vernatherm on the left is just not opening as much (or closing completely forget which way around it is) and so some oil is bypassing the cooler...

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby N3322G » Thu May 16, 2013 2:05 pm

Vernatherms are normally replaced at O/H but you might check. IIRC in 2005 oil coolers were $300 ea ... but I've slept since then.
Pat

 

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Thu May 16, 2013 5:52 pm

Thanks Pat, I'll check.

 

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

 

 

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby MULEFLY » Sat May 18, 2013 1:04 pm

@ Charles...

 

I only replaced the "hot" side... and they are now within a couple of degrees. I purchased a new cooler from Pacific Oil Cooler... including freight $248.12. My original intent was to replace the hot side... return it to POC for overhaul and then install it on the other side... when I did my flight tests... they were so close that I haven't bothered to send it back for overhaul.

Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Sat May 18, 2013 7:03 pm

Jim, that's a great approach - thanks! Guess that's another advantage of having 2 of everything.

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Engine Instruments Delima

Postby Charles Schefer » Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:18 pm

I wanted to share an update on this old thread... well really a couple updates since it's been awhile since I last posted on this topic and a lot has happened....

As of my last post on this (last year) my oil temps and pressures had been overhauled. My IA and I spent quite a bit of time adjusting the oil pressure regulators on both engines in concert with Lycoming's guidance to get the pressures exactly where they should be and I was thrilled so see my oil pressure gauges matching what the calibrated external mechanic's gauge that we'd "T-ed" in was telling us.

I also had purchased Air Parts of Lochaven's complete STC for new Rochester style oil temp probes and Air Part's calibrated "coupler kits" to make them work with the original AC gauges in the aircraft (and Air Parts of Lockahaven also calibrated my gauges and bench tested them with all this new stuff in place. The only outstanding squak after installing all this stuff is (as you can see from earlier posts) my left engine oil temp was running high.

My initial belief was that my left engine oil temp really was high... after all I'd just spent $1K having these old gauges calibrated with new bulbs and calibrated coupler kits so they should be accurate right? As a result of my believe I was often flying with the left engine cowl flap trailing open a bit to keep the oil temp out of the red line. I started suspecting that my left oil cooler may need to be overhauled.

Eventually I became suspicious of my new oil temp gauges because the CHTs were no warmer on the left side so I did some testing. My testing largely consisted of doing a series of test flights, letting the left side get hot (according to my gauge - hotter than the right), landing, shutting down and immediately putting a calibrated digital temp probe down into the oil pan thru the dipstick / filler. My probe is a 3' long K-type temp probe tied to my multimeter and is calibrated to within 1F of dead accurate at freezing and boiling so - good enough. And... I was just using it to compare left to right temps.

Using the same probe I went back and forth between the two engines taking oil pan temp readings right after shut down and guess what... the oil in the two oil pans was always within 1F of each other. Left and Right oil pans were always the same temp! So... if the Left engine oil really was running 40F+ hotter then how could it suddenly cool in the oil pan to the same exact temp as the right engine immediately after shut down??? It couldn't.

So... during my long annual and landing gear overhaul-refurb project at the beginning of this year I pulled all the oil temp probes out, the coupler kits, and the gauges, packed them all up and sent them back to Air Parts of Lockhaven. With these old gauges they have to be sent out as a set because to do an accurate calibration they must all be bench tested in the same configuration as they would be installed. The gauges create some electromagnetic interference and that must be taken into account, hence everything had go go back... Left AND right even tho I though only the left was at issue.

Air Parts confirmed that the left gauge was reading too high (erroneously) in the higher temperature band (if you look at the AC gauges the scale is not linear - it is more fine grained above 200F). Anyway, they corrected this problem, rechecked all the calibration and sent it all back. We reinstalled everything in the aircraft.

Once my gear project was complete and I could fly (around June) I found the gauges were now dead-accurate and I couldn't be happier... except for one small problem.... When I turned power on the right gauge would immediately respond and read ambient temp but the left gauge would do nothing.... for anywhere from 6-14min before it would finally "jump" and start reading the temp. When it did finally read the temp it was dead accurate and both my left and right oil temps were right in the middle of the green! But the start delay was annoying and I several times found myself waiting in the run-up block for the oil temp to start reading before I could go fly.

To make a long story short the problem was that in recalibrating for the second time on that left gauge, Air Parts had "overdone" the silicone in the needle bearing. On these old gauges, a small drop of silicone is put in the bearing / pivot point of the needle of the gauge. This acts as a "damper" so the needle is not vibrating in the plane and gives a steady reading. It's like a shock absorber - same as how a mechanic's gauge is filled with glycerine to dampen the needle movements. Anyway they put too much in so the needle would not move until the coils in the gauge heated up enough to make the silicone more fluid.

So recently my Attitude Indicator needed to be overhauled (subject of another thread) and while that was in progress I pulled both oil temp gauges, the coupler kits and probes all back out AGAIN and sent them all back again... (maybe 3rd time's a charm?) Anyway, I would like to have sent just the left gauge since all that was at issue was the silicone drop in the needle BUT... they insisted that under their 145 cert they have to recalibrate anything that leaves their shop and if they didn't have all my stuff to do the calibration (left AND right - everything) then they would have to use others they had there and then who knows if that would be the same as what's actually in the plane... so...out everything came and went back again.

So now I have everything back and reinstalled. I haven't test flown yet but I did a ground run. The right gauge still responds immediately and the left gauge responds after a few seconds (a few seconds is fine - much better than 14min!). From what I can tell the temps look right but the real test is in the air yet to come. Hopefully 3rd time is a charm.

I like the folks at Air Parts and appreciate what they do with these old gauges. I am however dismayed that it's taken sending my gauges and kits back 3 times to get things right (and hopefully they are right this time - as I said I have yet to test fly for this go around). The MOST frustrating aspect of this is that each time the gauges have come back they have come WITHOUT new copper gaskets for installing the oil bulbs. When I went thru this earlier this year during the annual (on the 2nd attempt) I had to call Air Parts and buy new gaskets from then but they only come as part of a "kit" from Rochester and they were $5.95 per "kit". All this "kit" had was the gasket I needed + 2two tiny nuts and washer for securing the wire to the probe which I already had and didn't need. Remember... these are Rochester oil probes now NOT the original OEM bulbs and these use a solid copper gasket not the normal crush gasket.

Well this go around I forgot what happened last time and sure enough the probes came back without new gaskets. I called and was told I should just reuse the old ones which neither I nor my IA felt we should do. The old ones were dented in and mared from use... yes they are solid but still I'd prefer new ones. Air Parts told me that I would once again have to buy those same kits... that's the only way to get the gaskets. The price...? $40 per kit!!!!! That's $80 plus shipping to get two little copper gaskets (they look exactly like spark plug gaskets only smaller). I refused to pay this and said I thought they ought to just send me gaskets given that I've been thru the R&R labor and shipping expense 3 times now because the gauges they sent were not correct the first 2 times. Their response? A take it or leave it shrug...

I emailed George McKinney at Air Parts and laid it all out.. I asked how gaskets I bought for $6 this past Jan could now cost $40 each. I provided him a copy of his own receipt from Jan showing the price previously paid. His response?... no response, he just blew me off. He's responded to other emails I've sent prior to this so I have no doubt it was received.

Out of sheer principle I refuse to pay $80 for two tiny gaskets which should have just been provided. I took 3 days of searching but I found the source for these gaskets and I want to share this info for anyone else who has Rochester oil probes....

The oil probes I have are Rochester P/N 3080-37. As you can see from the pic below these have different part numbers from Piper, Mooney, and Cessna...

Rochester Oil Temp Probe.png

The gasket that goes on the probe is P/N 0015-00724 and the primary source appears to be Cessna! They are somewhat hard to find but are $9.95 each. I bought extra this time just in case. Here's a pic...

Rochester Oil Bulb Crush Gasket.png

While my recent experience with Air Parts was a big frustration I do appreciate what they do to support these old gauges. Hopefully 3rd time's a charm. It does look like the problem of the delayed start to read has been solved and hopefully on my test flight I'll find the gauges nice an accurate as they were before I sent them in. If anyone else needs gaskets for Rochester oil probes (again not the standard crush gasket) see the notes above. I validated this with multiple sources including Rochester and I compared the new gaskets to my old used ones and they are the same part.

- Charles

User avatar
Charles Schefer
 
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm
This topic was modified 4 years ago by ICS archives 2008-2018

   
Quote
Share: