Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
307 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

Postby Tom Corell » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:11 am

Check This Out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEOmCkZy ... _embedded#!
Coments Please.
Tom C.
Tom Corell
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:08 pm

Tom,
Yes this happened! Cir. 1969-70 I think. Fred Haise (NASA test pilot and astronaut of apollo 13 fame) was the pilot. The aircraft was 20% over red line in a dive, with agravated conditions (the yoke was being excited). After multiple attempts, they finally got one to go to full cyclic flutter. Note buckling in the aft fuselage section. Aircraft was repaired as the aft bulhead was cracked, but no damage was noted in the tail assembly, only near the interface to the fuselage. Sad note, this aircraft survived until the 80's when it crashed, killing 4 due to fuel exhaustion, a totally stupid and preventable situation.
-Zach
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Re: Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

Postby Chief » Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:39 pm

Tom,

I've seen the video, interesting. Didn't know all that Zach addeed, but it makes me feel ever better about our planes.

By the way, great article in this month's Aviation Safety magazine. It speaks in great detail about True Airspeed, Indicated Air Speed, etc. Very educational. You can get in a dangerous situation with the Airspeed Indicator below yellow or red lines. Just something to think about. How important is it to be 5 minutes faster to your destination?

We have a 250, a great bird, and it is faster than driving, I am committed to be more conscious of speeds after reading the Aviation Safety article.

Just a thought!

User avatar
Chief
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:01 pm
Location: K9A4

Re: Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:55 pm

Brett,
You bring up a good point. Flutter is a function of Mach, or in other words true airspeed adjusted for current mach. In small aircraft operating below 18K feet, the published Vne as a fixed number is usually OK. The margine between bad things and normalcy do get significantly smaller as you get into the higher altitude/higher TAS range of the flight envelope. This is part of the reason why Turbine aircraft have no yellow arc as Vne is set at the top of the normal operating airspeed range. It is also why most turbine aircraft certified to higher altitudes have a movable "barber pole" indicator that reduces the top limit of the Vne as the Mach speed increases vs. IAS. It is of note that the Turbo Twin Comanche has a reduced Vne above 20K' due to this penominon (Rayjay AFM Suppliment).
-Zach
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Re: Redline Vs. Stabilator Torque Tube

Postby Tom Corell » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:21 am

Zach,

Thanks for your input educational as usual,I agree with Brett I feel even better about the structural strength of our airplanes.
Tom c.

Tom Corell
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 8:18 pm

   
Quote
Share: