Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

Miller conversion questions

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
1,652 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

Miller conversion questions

Postby Andrew Fay » Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:29 pm

In my search for a 260B I strayed into the twins. I found a miller conversion an was impressed with the idea. I went to look at the airplane and took pics of the logs so i could study in detail when i got home.

Upon looking at the currnet W&B I found something that discouraged me. It looks like after all the converting there is not associated increased Gross Weight. That means that this particular aircraft has only 1000LBS usable. You would think the wing lockers and the big engines would give you room on the zero fuel weight and engines and nose baggage would prompt a GW increase.

Am I right in my study? Is the miller that limited on GW?

Thanks

Andrew Fay
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:22 pm

In a word, yes. The maximum LEGAL gross weight of any twin Comanche is 3800#, and that is only available through the addition of a Robertson High Lift kit. Tip tanks get you 125 extra pounds of fuel, and miller integral tanks also get you an additional bit of weight ( can't remember the exact number but 75 sticks in my mind for some reason), but the extra stuff hung on the aircraft for the Miller mods did not raise the gross weight.
Last edited by Zach Grant L1011jock on Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Andrew Fay » Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:14 am

Well, thats a real let down. Im sure lots of people just fly overwieght but I cant really hang my ticket out there like that. Gots to do it by the letter of the law.
Andrew Fay
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Kristin Winter » Sun Jan 01, 2012 5:14 pm

It is possible to find twins with 1200+ lbs of useful load. My "C" model is just shy of 1200, but I have deicing which adds significantly. I do have the tip tanks that add 125lbs of useful, less the weight of the installation. Considering that the twins don't burn that much more than the singles, that works out to be about 500 miles of flying with 800 lbs in the cabin. I have also taken my 120 gallons of fuel and flown 1200 nm with just myself on board.
Kristin
User avatar
Kristin Winter
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Sun Jan 01, 2012 5:25 pm

I had a 63 Normally Aspirated twin with a true 1400# useful load (I weighed it). It had tip tanks, and was overall a clean light aircraft with no mods to add weight. It also trued out at almost 170 kts stock, no speed mods. It was strait, with no damage history. They are out there!
-Zach
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Andrew Fay » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:03 pm

Thanks for the info guys, Im still leaning towards a single for a few reasons but we will see what comes out of the woodwork.
Andrew Fay
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Jay » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:35 pm

I have 1,198 useful in my twin. That's with the Robertson GW gain, but also includes some heavy stuff like turbos, a leather interior, nice carpet, etc. An early NA Twinkie with a fairly stock interior and no speed mods or de-ice gear but new radios would probably be the useful load champ.

Jay

Jay
PA 30 N7702Y
User avatar
Jay
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon
  •  

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby N3322G » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:09 pm

Before all the mods and total of 10 fuel tanks, the 1970 PA39 had 1342 useful load. Now we are at 1151.54 approximately :-)

By the way, it might or might not be worthwhile checking the math. On the 2010 annual we found 3 separate CG calc errors as well as useful load errors. We documented it and now have correct data int he Flight Manual.

Pat

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby MULEFLY » Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:55 pm

N8982Y 39-147 has a 1254 pound useful load... Robertson Mods give it a net of about an additional 175#... I have the automatic flap retraction kit that adds a few pounds. The 3,800 # Max Gross Take Off Weight -- no tip tanks...

Jim

MULEFLY
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Miller conversion questions

Postby Don Nelson » Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:57 am

Hello Andrew,
A legal 1000# useful sounds about right, unfortuneately.

My Miller Turbo 30B, serial #1266, with Robertson Hi Lift, Arapaho WS, Tip Tanks, Wing Lockers, Radar, but no nose locker, reportedly weighed 2835# when I purchased it last summer.

Since then, with an extensive panel upgrade, (that incidently dumped the radar), it was weighed at 2813# including 6 gal's unusable fuel. Leaving N12FS with 987# useful.

Goes pretty good tho. (-:

Don

User avatar
Don Nelson
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 5:57 pm
Location: Burlington, Washington; KBVS

   
Quote
Share: