This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues
If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com
Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.
All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.
ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
I am almost done with my "heart transplant" on my 180. After the debacle of an overhaul that started back in Sept., and had to be redone in January, I am very excited to get reaquanted with a new and improved old friend. So far this has been REALLY expensive vs what it should cost (I will address this in a separate post), but I figured, whats another 3 AMUs at this point, so I ordered the ElectroAir STC'd Electronic Ignition.
This is a HIGH QUALITY KIT!!!! The only complaint is that the supplied thumb drive that had all of the documentation on it crashed after the first use, but they have all of the documents online at their website so no big deal. The only additional things needed to complete the install are a 2 amp and 10 amp breaker, a toggle switch, and plumbing fittings to tap into the MP line. It has four main components. The trigger mounts in lieu of the rt mag, the brain box and MP sensor mount under the panel, and the coil box mounts to the firewall. My biggest issue was finding space behind my panel to mount the brain box and MP sensor (I have lots of remote mounted stuff behind the panle already). Otherwise, it is very straightforward, but I would say an average install on a Comanche is probably more like 8-10 hrs, not the 4-6 they quote. I haven't fired the engine yet, but should be able to when I get back home next week.
In case you haven't been following, this is the first fully STC'd electronic ignition available for the certified fleet. It is essentially the Jeff Rose ignition system that has flown thousands of hours in many experimental applications, holding several altitude and speed records in aircraft ranging from EZ types to RV types and others. It is now available for the 4 cyl lycoming powered singles primerily. For us, it is now approved for all PA-24-180s regardless of the prop installed (recent amendment to the STC adding Hartzell Props). The system still keeps the existing left mag as backup in the event of total electrical failure. The EI has a spark advance authority up to 40 degrees before TDC, so as the charge density in the combustion chamber becomes less, it advances the timing so that the peak pressure matches closer to the start of the power stroke, not after the stroke is partially completed, which is what happens with the fixed timing setup we have used for so many years. This more optimized spark translates into more power at altitude and greater efficiency. As all of you know, this follows my eternal quest that I embarked on over 6 years ago of maximizing the performance and efficiency of the 180. I hope this adds to the efficiency of this fine aircraft.
I will post again when I have some real flight results on this system. Lets hope it is all it is cracked up to be.
-Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Thanks
Mark
Mark Anderson- ICS member
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:24 am
- Location: Huntsville , AL
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Nice! Any chance the 6 cylinder crowd will be able to join in the fun, ie approval for the O/IO 540's?
Thanks, Don
- 9089P
- ICS member
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 7:01 am
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
I don't know what the future holds for the 6 cyl STC'd version. They do have experimental kits for the 6 cyl Lycs and Cont. A quick call to them might shed some light on that. They are great folks to talk too and they were very good at helping me through a couple of minor issues.
-Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Thank you for your suggestion. I contacted Electroair and they are working on an STC for the 6 cyl market. They hope to have it by Oshkosh time. I have gotten on their email list to receive updates and will provide any meaningful updates to this forum.
- 9089P
- ICS member
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 7:01 am
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Thanks
Jim
- MULEFLY
- ICS member
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
It is approved for some 320s already. I would call them and ask about adding the pa30 to the STC. I don't know if the VR would give the unit fits, but the can probably set it up for one.
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
If I recall, a similar system called Lasar was never an economic success because fuel economy improvement was marginal.
T210DRVR- ICS member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
- Location: So. Oregon
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Jim
T210DRVR- ICS member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
- Location: So. Oregon
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
I have not had any issues. 180+ hrs now and no issues. I am running the recommended REM37BY plugs (tempest brand) with the crab claw electrodes. They are all on the bottom plug positions and I am running fine wires on the top powered by the mag. I do run lean and the engine is tight, but my lead deposits are no more than they were with two mags, which is to say minimal.I usually operate in the 9-12K altitude area, and turn 2200 RPM so power settings are not real high. All my CHT's are in the optimum range of 370-400 on 99% of all flights except on the coldest of high altitude letdowns. I really don't see how the spark advance would add to a lead fouling issue but stranger things have happened.
-Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
My top plugs are standard Tempest Massives and rarely require cleaning. I like to run at the same altitudes but 2400 RPM.
The cleaning is so easily done that I consider it a minor annoyance. Now that I've gone electronic I'm not going back. I like the high altitude performance and economy too much.
T210DRVR- ICS member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:31 am
- Location: So. Oregon
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
All the best!
Jim
- MULEFLY
- ICS member
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
A question: If the single can have both magnetos replaced by a dual Electro Air Ignition system, why does the twin have only one magneto replaced om each engine?
I have long thought that the time had come to get rid of antiquated magnetos so I am pleased about this STC. From the reports the engine does seem to run smoother with this mod.
Terry
- Terry Rawlins
- ICS member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: France
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
The singles only have one mag replaced. The left mag remains as a backup as the electronic ignition is not self generating in the event of an electrical failure. I still like the system very much!
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
My CHTs were lower with my old engine. It was a Lyc factory overhaul that only lasted 1380 hours before the bottom end was found to be worn out. My new limits rebuild runs a bit hotter cht wise, but cooler oil temp wise. It has new Lyc cyl. And my plane does have Daves cowl, but when I put it on, I didnt see any real change in CHTs from where they were. The old engine would run 340-380 on all cyl on all but the most arduous hot climbs, or extended cold letdowns.
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
If on the single the Left remains as a back up in case of Electrical Failure, I assume the same is the case for the Twin. So as the engine runs smoother on the Electronic System, on both the Single and the Twin is the Left Mag kept switched off during flight and only switched on in an emergency?
Terry
- Terry Rawlins
- ICS member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: France
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
The system is the same single or twin. The mag stays on as normal, but it is basically firing for not as the electronic spark advances beyond the set timing of the mag. If the electronic goes off line, the engine just reverts to the mag sparks with the resultant loss of performance and smoothness.
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Any chance this will support an LIO engine?
Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas
N3322G- ICS member
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas area
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Jim
BTW... the units are $3,400 on the Electroair site... $2,890 at Aircraft Spruce.
- MULEFLY
- ICS member
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
I'm a bit away from 500 hours but had the same thought as Jim so - early in the project - maybe 2013 annual or 2014 more likely. I've been following this enhancement with great interest. Thanks for breaking new ground Zach.
Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas
N3322G- ICS member
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas area
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
I am preparing to overhaul my IO320 C1A's on my twin comanche in about a month.
One of the upgrades I am considering it the Electroair ignition. Any suggestions or comments since the last post here on your satisfaction with it now that its been on your plane for a few years?
Thanks, Chris
- Christopher Hufnagel
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:01 am
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
At altitude with little wind effect, I saw as much as 14 NMPG flying WEST to Portland. I'll go back out there this weekend to retrieve it after 5 months with John van Bladeren... my goal is to have an airplane that can go non-stop from WI to Ft. Meyers, FL non-stop... with nacelle tanks and the EI... if the wind gods are good... should have an hour in reserve.
Good system... phenomenal preliminary results.
Jim
- MULEFLY
- ICS member
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2000 1:34 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
It is great to hear that you have been so happy and highly recommend EI.
I am almost certain I am going to add it to my Twin this summer during overhaul.
I hope family things are improving for you and you are able to get back in the air soon.
Best,
chris
- Christopher Hufnagel
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:01 am
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
If you have C1As I'm guessing you are turboed. If so, you won't see significant gains while your MP is over 24", but you will see a hotter spark and no flashover at higher altitudes. It will also start easier and run smoother at all rpms. If you don't run with much boost, you should see some serious gains in efficiency/power at lower power settings. I still love mine, and several friends have put them on their Comanches and love the results as well. Great system that has been all but trouble free since working the bugs out after installation. Put the 1300$ it costs to overhaul your left mag towards the EI system and the price starts to look a bit more reasonable. Add in the performance gains and fuel savings and you will quickly pay for the system based on operational savings alone.
Zach
Zach Grant L1011jock- Technical Advisor
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
- Location: Indianapolis KEYE
Re: ElectroAir Electronic Ignition project
Thanks for the reply and thoughts. You are correct, my plane is turbo and I have not heard the comment on the fuel savings being significantly less for the turbos at altitude. We typically fly between 10k and 17k so I appreciate your sharing that. It still sounds like a good system to add. I appreciate both your comments and Jim's. I think I am going to proceed with the upgrade... I'm looking forward to seeing the results!
Fly safe-
chris
- Christopher Hufnagel
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:01 am