Forum

Notifications
Clear all

This Forum is a place for Piper Comanche pilots to communicate and discuss technical issues

If you join or reset a password, please check your Spam Email box for emails from Admin at ComancheTechTalk.com

Please put your questions on the forum as well so everyone can read and respond. Someone else might be having similar questions.

All questions or topics on the Forums automatically get sent to the Tech team as well.

Flaps

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
191 Views
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1162
Topic starter  

Flaps

Postby Mark Anderson » Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:41 pm

I have been collecting old Comanche magazine advertisements from the sixties. Piper advertised for the 1962 Comanche that the flaps were improved, higher lift and better for short field landings. Is there really any aerodynamic difference in the flaps between 1961-1962 models, besides being electric? Would these flaps be interchangeable?

Thanks,

Mark

User avatar
Mark Anderson
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Huntsville , AL

Re: Flaps

Postby Zach Grant L1011jock » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:27 pm

Yes the flaps are different. The manual flaps use an asymetric hinge type fowler flaps setup resulting in a Cherokee-esque flap movement, simply hinging below the wing, so moving slightly aft as they are extended down. The electric flap models actually use a tracked fowler type flap (think Cessna singles), where the flap translates aft as well as down, while using 3 flap tracks and rollers to do so. No they are not interchangeable, nor are the speed mods that interface with the flaps and wing (gap seals, spats etc). I would add that there really is not much difference operationally between the two types of Comanche flaps besides the power source, and more maint. required for flap tracks and rollers. The planes still go in and out of the same runways, and the flaps add lift, and drag, to an otherwise clean wing. The infinite adjustment capability of the electric flaps do make a difficult endeavour of repeatable partial flaps landings, which is why I advocate an all or nothing flap approach to electric flap birds. One more thing, the manual flaps survived until 1964, as they were the only flap system ever installed on the 180.
"Keep it above 5 feet and don't do nuthin dumb!"
User avatar
Zach Grant L1011jock
Technical Advisor
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Indianapolis KEYE

Re: Flaps

Postby N3322G » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:10 pm

Mark, Please excuse the slight thread hijack.

Zach, like the new photo - what a very spacious 'Comanche' cockpit :-)

Pat

Patricia Jayne (Pat) Keefer ICS 08899
PA-39 #10 Texas

User avatar
N3322G
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas area

Re: Flaps

Postby Hank Spellman » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:37 pm

Zach did not mention another important difference between the two flap designs: the effect on the weight and balance loading envelope.

If you compare the two envelopes (available in the type data sheets), you will see that the electric flap models allow for an increased forward loading over the manual flap model at higher weights. This is important because the 250's tend to be a little heavy in the nose.

The aft limits are the same.

Hank

User avatar
Hank Spellman
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2000 3:13 am
Location: Lincoln, IL

Re: Flaps

Postby Mark Anderson » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:55 pm

Zach and Hank, thanks for the explanation and background. I never noticed the difference. I like the manual flaps on my 61 model. Next time I see an electric flap model I will look for the differences. I just about always use 2 notches for take off and full for landing. I figure this way when I am heavy or using a short runway I won't forget to use flaps.
User avatar
Mark Anderson
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Huntsville , AL

Re: Flaps

Postby 9089P » Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:47 am

Not to disagree with Zach but I have electric flaps and use partial flaps on a regular basis with no problems. My flap indicator gauge is consistent in its readings (I checked by putting indicator lines on the flaps using black electrical tape) and fairly accurate with regard to the 1/2 flap indication(bottom of the white arc on the flap gauge). I generally put the gear down on the 45 and go to 1/2 flaps on the turn to downwind for better vis and to further slow down. Go to full flaps on final unless there is a hefty cross wind.

Good luck, Don

9089P
ICS member
ICS member
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 7:01 am

   
Quote
Share: